Page 22 - PDI Vol 2
P. 22

Technical persons of suitable level and with sound technical knowledge of IT systems and Data Analytics along with
          understanding of PRIs, need to be involved, as it is not just PDI as a score, but its interpretation that is important.

          Challenges and Limitations of PDI - PDI has great potential in developing a localized developmental paradigm,
          but has its limitations and challenges. It is a tough data collection exercise with heavy reliance on data from multiple
          sources and departments. Survey as a tool needs to be built in and a robust technology platform has to be built that can
          respond also creatively. Data analysis and effective presentation and interpretation is required, as PDI developmental

          status needs to be seen and understood in the context of resources, the endowed advantageous and disadvantaged GPs,
          peri-urban GP versus an interior GP, etc. PDI may not take into account specific context and challenges faced by a
          particular  panchayat,  leading  to  unfair  comparisons.  E.g.,  migrations,  limitations  of  livelihood  opportunities,  a
          panchayat may be doing worse in water related indicators because it lies in a water scarce region, and not due to lack of
          effort. PDI is not a substitute for schematic targets and measurements. It needs to be seen in conjunction with them.

          Stakeholders and Resources - PDI is not just a set of calculations and proclamation of the result. It is far more
          than that. Even to be able to give the development index status of 2.69 lakh GPs on the PDI, to start with, there are

          some basic roles and responsibility of all stakeholders. NITI Aayog, MoSPI, Central Ministries, State Governments,
          District  administration,  Line  Departments,  NIC,  District  and  Block  Panchayats,  CSOs,  CBOs,  GPs  and  MoPR.  In
          addition, Institutions, INGOs, ERs, and media can enable PDI to deliver to its full scope The village needs to identify
          how it will involve the existing Committees and form required CBOs for the achievement under this Theme

          Data required must come from Departments and GPs own data. Convergent action is required to ensure that the various
          inputs from the schemes of Departments feed into the preparation of GPDP for the indicators/targets.

          Standing Committees of the GP need to be strengthened and capacitated on their roles & responsibilities for preparation

          of  theme-based  GPDP.  Discussion  on  GPDP  with  Departments  concerned  in  Standing  Committees,  Scheme
          Committees, to be put in the joint calendar worked out with Departments.

          OGD - Data of panchayats should be clearly visible and an open book. Use of technology with transparency will
          be key to effective data collection. PDI must follow the principles and spirit of Open Government Data.

          Monitoring - Strong emphasis is placed on this, as this is a new area, evolving area, and needs to be grounded
          well. It involves a lot of detailed and systematic working, and considering its importance needs keen monitoring by
          MoPR.

          Significance  of PDI  -  The  use  of PDI with  its component  parts  of  Themes  and  LIF,  along with  analysis and
          interpretations can:

                 1.  Capture the status and movement in development at grass root level

                 2.  Ensure rapid transformation of Panchayats by focused intervention in 9 thematic areas.

                 3.  Sustainable  development: Apart  from  traditional indicators on infrastructure,  socio-economic  indicators,
                     PDI  also  captures  data  on  emerging  areas  like  environmental  cooperation,  organic  farming,  waste
                     management, mental health, renewable energy use, etc. Capturing of such data will help ensure awareness

                     and action on these indicators.

                 4.  Identify & scale best practices both sector and geography specific
                 5.  Monitor progress of outcome indicators at required frequency of intervals
                                                             xvi
   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27